FA Cup ·

Chelsea 1–0 Leeds: AI predicted 1–1 ✗

Updated · ScoreGPT multi-model panel
Chelsea
1–0final
Leeds

Download the free app

Every model's pick, full analysis — free to start.

What did the AI predict for Chelsea vs Leeds?

ScoreGPT's AI panel predicted Chelsea vs Leeds (FA Cup) at a 1–1 consensus scoreline, with 2 of 5 models backing a draw. The final result and grade are below — information only, not betting advice.

Every pick is graded after full time — see how our grading works and the live AI model leaderboard.

What you get in the app

Every model's reasoning — not just the score

See all model picks, the full breakdown, and how each one performed — free.

Every AI model’s scoreline pick and its confidence for the same match in the ScoreGPT app
ScoreGPT model rankings screen with rolling outcome accuracy for every AI model

See the full analysis — free

Why ScoreGPT's AI panel leaned this way — Chelsea vs Leeds

  • Chelsea 5-game scoreless streak
  • Manager sacked 72 hours before match
  • Leeds 7-game unbeaten run
  • Leeds unbeaten vs Chelsea this season

From ScoreGPT's pre-match AI analysis of Chelsea vs Leeds, written before kickoff on 26 April 2026:

Consensus on Chelsea's Crisis

All five expert analyses agree that Chelsea are in a historic collapse — five straight Premier League losses without scoring, manager sacked days before the semi-final, and a crippling injury list (Estevao out for season, Palmer and Joao Pedro doubtful). Leeds, in contrast, are unbeaten in seven and have already taken four points off Chelsea this season. The market still prices Chelsea as favorites (~45% implied win probability), but the experts see this as a major overreaction to reputation and cup form against lower-league opposition.

Disagreements Resolved

While predicted scores vary (2-1 home win from Grok, 1-2 away from Gemini, 1-1 from Kimi and Claude, 0-1 from GPT), the prediction recommendations align strongly. The top-performing models (Grok, GPT, Claude) all highlight similar inefficiencies: Chelsea's five-game scoring drought, managerial chaos, and Leeds' defensive solidity and counter-attacking threat.

Key Factors Driving the Prediction

  • Chelsea's 5-game PL scoring drought (worst since 1912) — systematic breakdown, not bad luck.
  • Manager sacked 72 hours before kickoff — interim U21 coach Calum McFarlane has no senior semi-final experience.
  • Leeds' 7-match unbeaten run includes a 3-1 win over Chelsea and a 2-2 draw.
  • Neutral venue at Wembley removes Chelsea's home advantage, and Leeds are comfortable away (7 of last 8 away games ended in draws).

The model panel — graded: Chelsea vs Leeds

FA Cup · 26 April 2026 · scorelines read Chelsea–Leeds

Every pick, graded on the final result: Chelsea 1–0 Leeds.

Claude Opus 4.6
1–1
✗ Miss
Gemini 3.1 Pro
1–2
✗ Miss
GPT-5.4
0–1
✗ Miss
Kimi K2.5
1–1
✗ Miss
Grok 4.20
2–1
✓ Hit

See every model's reasoning + today's picks — free →

Frequently asked

Who did the AI predict to win Chelsea vs Leeds?

2 of 5 AI models analyzed by ScoreGPT predicted a draw before kickoff. The match finished Chelsea 1–0 Leeds, so the consensus pick was wrong — and it stays on the public record either way.

What score did the AI predict for Chelsea vs Leeds?

ScoreGPT's averaged AI scoreline was Chelsea 1–1 Leeds. The actual final score was Chelsea 1–0 Leeds.

How does ScoreGPT make FA Cup predictions?

Multiple AI models independently analyze form, squads and match context for every covered FA Cup fixture. ScoreGPT compares their picks and grades every prediction publicly after the final whistle.

Which AI models have predicted Chelsea vs Leeds?

5 AI models predicted this match, each graded on the final result: Claude Opus 4.6 1–1 (✗ wrong result); Gemini 3.1 Pro 1–2 (✗ wrong result); GPT-5.4 0–1 (✗ wrong result); Kimi K2.5 1–1 (✗ wrong result); Grok 4.20 2–1 (✓ correct result). Every pick is graded publicly after full time.

More FA Cup predictions

Recent FA Cup results — graded

AI predictions are for information and entertainment only — not betting advice. 18+. Please play responsibly.